Search:

[QUOTE=BananaCucho;675028]Ah, the good ole "I was just being sarcastic not serious >.> <.< >.>" excuse[/QUOTE]

You're bad at this and you should feel bad.

Originally Posted by BananaCucho

Ah, the good ole "I was just being sarcastic not serious >.> <.< >.>" excuse

You're bad at this and you should feel bad.

[QUOTE=Kovath;675018]imo against the spirit of the game[/QUOTE]

I was being sarcastic.

[QUOTE=Mesk514;675019]the majority.[/QUOTE]

There's no good or bad team, there's just your team and the others team.

Originally Posted by Kovath

imo against the spirit of the game

I was being sarcastic.

Originally Posted by Mesk514

the majority.

There's no good or bad team, there's just your team and the others team.

[QUOTE=Mesk514;675016]shut up sino, i was on the good team.[/QUOTE]

What "good team" ?

Originally Posted by Mesk514

shut up sino, i was on the good team.

What "good team" ?

[QUOTE=thedougler;675007]The only way to win is not to play at all. DEEP.[/QUOTE]

Yup, let that sink in.

[QUOTE=Cryptonic;675008]Next time, I'm not going to read my rolecard until the voting phase lol[/QUOTE]

That's a great idea, i'm gonna do that in my next FM games aswell, can't look scummy if i don't know i'm scum.

Originally Posted by thedougler

The only way to win is not to play at all. DEEP.

Yup, let that sink in.

Originally Posted by Cryptonic

Next time, I'm not going to read my rolecard until the voting phase lol

That's a great idea, i'm gonna do that in my next FM games aswell, can't look scummy if i don't know i'm scum.

Hey guys, look, Mesk claimed inno and was a conspirator !

Hope you'll remember the lesson.

Also i'd like to congratulate [MENTION=11750]Gyrlander[/MENTION] on his flawless play this game.

Hey guys, look, Mesk claimed inno and was a conspirator !

Hope you'll remember the lesson.

Also i'd like to congratulate @Gyrlander on his flawless play this game.

[QUOTE=Voss;674896]i don't have to evaluate all of you. that's the mistake you guys made last game, and made yourselves seem so scummy to mesk. (or that's what i interpretted). i only have to figure out if ONE person is innocent or conspirator. And i think crypt's playing innocent.[/QUOTE]

That's a simplistic way of looking at it, what makes you think Crypt isn't just fooling you ?

Originally Posted by Voss

i don't have to evaluate all of you. that's the mistake you guys made last game, and made yourselves seem so scummy to mesk. (or that's what i interpretted). i only have to figure out if ONE person is innocent or conspirator. And i think crypt's playing innocent.

That's a simplistic way of looking at it, what makes you think Crypt isn't just fooling you ?

[QUOTE=Voss;674862]i sincerely doubt anyone's going to be around at this time, but this is me checking in, and i 100% percent promise to not check if matt zed changed the percentage or not. however, i thought this might be really easy for innocents to win if they get just ONE person that they trust. if that happens, they have to believe its all innocents, which makes it kind of easy for innnocents to win, if they only look for the one person they trst 100% than the enemy they don't trust 100% at all...[/QUOTE]

[MENTION=6527]Voss[/MENTION], can you explain what you meant here exactly ?

Originally Posted by Voss

i sincerely doubt anyone's going to be around at this time, but this is me checking in, and i 100% percent promise to not check if matt zed changed the percentage or not. however, i thought this might be really easy for innocents to win if they get just ONE person that they trust. if that happens, they have to believe its all innocents, which makes it kind of easy for innnocents to win, if they only look for the one person they trst 100% than the enemy they don't trust 100% at all...

@Voss , can you explain what you meant here exactly ?

[QUOTE=Cryptonic;674882]This can be flipped on you. Why are you so open this entire game to it being non-conspiracy? That sole fact alone that you're NOT being as paranoid as I would expect other Innocents to be just helps reinforce that you're Conspirator.[/QUOTE]

I'm open to both possibilities, too much paranoia won't get me anywhere, because, as Doug pointed out, it's a 50/50.

Originally Posted by Cryptonic

This can be flipped on you. Why are you so open this entire game to it being non-conspiracy? That sole fact alone that you're NOT being as paranoid as I would expect other Innocents to be just helps reinforce that you're Conspirator.

I'm open to both possibilities, too much paranoia won't get me anywhere, because, as Doug pointed out, it's a 50/50.

[QUOTE=Cryptonic;674879]Convince me otherwise, then.
I don't see why someone would get mad at me. If you are Innocent then you can vote No-Conspiracy. As long as we don't have more than 50% of the players saying they're going to vote conspiracy. But I am putting my foot down first, because I am not getting my vote swayed by Conspirators to be like "derp Cryptonic you should be one of the No-Conspiracy voters." nope go away lol[/QUOTE]

I'm getting mad at you, neither am i telling you to vote for either possibility, i'm just asking you why you are so set in stone that early in the game.

Originally Posted by Cryptonic

Convince me otherwise, then.
I don't see why someone would get mad at me. If you are Innocent then you can vote No-Conspiracy. As long as we don't have more than 50% of the players saying they're going to vote conspiracy. But I am putting my foot down first, because I am not getting my vote swayed by Conspirators to be like "derp Cryptonic you should be one of the No-Conspiracy voters." nope go away lol

I'm getting mad at you, neither am i telling you to vote for either possibility, i'm just asking you why you are so set in stone that early in the game.

[QUOTE=Cryptonic;674876]GEE GEE admitting that it's Setup A lmao. No other reason you'd be angry that I refuse to be open minded.[/QUOTE]

Huh ? You're usually a bit more logical than that, Crypt.

Originally Posted by Cryptonic

GEE GEE admitting that it's Setup A lmao. No other reason you'd be angry that I refuse to be open minded.

Huh ? You're usually a bit more logical than that, Crypt.

[QUOTE=Cryptonic;674872]csb, then vote no conspiracy. I will be remaining paranoid.[/QUOTE]

What's the point of playing this game if you're not even considering changing your mind ?

Originally Posted by Cryptonic

csb, then vote no conspiracy. I will be remaining paranoid.

What's the point of playing this game if you're not even considering changing your mind ?

[QUOTE=thedougler;674866]Are you stating you believe there is no conspiracy? That is quite bold considering just half the players have actually spoken so far. Have you singled out someone you 100% believe is inno in that case?[/QUOTE]

I have not stated anything yet, what i meant was that [U]in case[/U] there's no conspiracy, you voting for one isn't a big deal because we all win together.

Of course, in case of a conspiracy, that doesn't matter because i'm the only one to vote.

Originally Posted by thedougler

Are you stating you believe there is no conspiracy? That is quite bold considering just half the players have actually spoken so far. Have you singled out someone you 100% believe is inno in that case?

I have not stated anything yet, what i meant was that in case there's no conspiracy, you voting for one isn't a big deal because we all win together.

Of course, in case of a conspiracy, that doesn't matter because i'm the only one to vote.

[QUOTE=thedougler;674864]I wouldn't have trusted Mesk last game, and I sure as hell don't trust him based on what he has said so far this time. He was still innocent last time though. Some people just come across as scummy no matter what. I'm going to give Mesk some more leeway than I would to others to prove his innocence. If he keeps this up though and others continue to sweep it under the rug, I'm going to have to call you all out on your conspiracy.[/QUOTE]

That's fine as long as enough of us go for the correct vote.

Originally Posted by thedougler

I wouldn't have trusted Mesk last game, and I sure as hell don't trust him based on what he has said so far this time. He was still innocent last time though. Some people just come across as scummy no matter what. I'm going to give Mesk some more leeway than I would to others to prove his innocence. If he keeps this up though and others continue to sweep it under the rug, I'm going to have to call you all out on your conspiracy.

That's fine as long as enough of us go for the correct vote.

[QUOTE=Voss;674862]i sincerely doubt anyone's going to be around at this time, but this is me checking in, and i 100% percent promise to not check if matt zed changed the percentage or not. however, i thought this might be really easy for innocents to win if they get just ONE person that they trust. if that happens, they have to believe its all innocents, which makes it kind of easy for innnocents to win, if they only look for the one person they trst 100% than the enemy they don't trust 100% at all...[/QUOTE]

He obviously didn't, look at Doug's first post.

And i don't really get your point about the one person we're supposed to look for, what if there's one guy we trust and one guy we don't ?

Originally Posted by Voss

i sincerely doubt anyone's going to be around at this time, but this is me checking in, and i 100% percent promise to not check if matt zed changed the percentage or not. however, i thought this might be really easy for innocents to win if they get just ONE person that they trust. if that happens, they have to believe its all innocents, which makes it kind of easy for innnocents to win, if they only look for the one person they trst 100% than the enemy they don't trust 100% at all...

He obviously didn't, look at Doug's first post.

And i don't really get your point about the one person we're supposed to look for, what if there's one guy we trust and one guy we don't ?