Search Results - SC2 Mafia
Register

Search:

Type: Posts; User: Firebringer

Page 1 of 40 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.14 seconds.

  1. Forum:General Discussion

    Thread:My Perma-Ban on MU

    Thread Author:Helz

    Post Author:Firebringer

    Replies
    76
    Views
    8,193

    ►►Re: My Perma-Ban on MU◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by OzyWho View Post
    Don't take this personally, but I'd trust your statement only with a source, to see it for myself that there's really nothing more to the story.

    I've learned to not take such statements at face value. Last time I did that, I was lead to wrongfully believe that the MU mods had bullied someone to suicide in the past - until I did my own "research" and saw that the proclaimed dead person has had alt accounts that they played on still years/months after the fact.
    Just take it as rumor than. It wasn't like I fact checked this person, so I can't even guarantee what i was told true.
  2. Forum:General Discussion

    Thread:Arizona Election Proven Stolen

    Thread Author:Voss

    Post Author:Firebringer

    Replies
    41
    Views
    4,230

    ►►Re: Arizona Election Proven Stolen◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Helz View Post
    I think we should think whatever makes us think that we are right. If you think about it thought processes like these need to be controlled to protect society and prevent the collateral expansion of chaos that naturally comes from such concepts. The loss of free thought is a minor sacrifice when compared to the protection gained by society through controlling the radical thought processes created by a free society. At the end of the day any moral leader must acknowledge the only true protection a society can offer to the individual is to remove their freedom before they destroy the freedom of other individuals and that the acceptance of oppression is the true logical conclusion of protecting freedom.
    I would think a moral leader would be one who protected a persons liberties/freedoms vs sacrificing themselves for 'safety'.
  3. Forum:General Discussion

    Thread:My Perma-Ban on MU

    Thread Author:Helz

    Post Author:Firebringer

    Replies
    76
    Views
    8,193

    ►►Re: My Perma-Ban on MU◄◄

    Semi related to this thread but i know of someone who got banned for calling a mod a racist on MU. It was like two years ago. So lesson learned mods can call you racist and ban you, and you get banned when you call them racist. They got a perfect system =)
  4. Forum:General Discussion

    Thread:My Perma-Ban on MU

    Thread Author:Helz

    Post Author:Firebringer

    Replies
    76
    Views
    8,193

    ►►Re: My Perma-Ban on MU◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Marshmallow Marshall View Post
    Now, I don't want to ruin the fun, but aren't we currently beating the same point over and over with the same arguments (and with a consensual conclusion)? I have the deep feeling continuing this thread is pointless, at least at the moment.
    Listen, don't stop the circle jerk until everyone climaxes.
  5. Forum:General Discussion

    Thread:Arizona Election Proven Stolen

    Thread Author:Voss

    Post Author:Firebringer

    Replies
    41
    Views
    4,230

    ►►Re: Arizona Election Proven Stolen◄◄

    how can i not be sure ur not a globalist trying to blame the deep state.

    i bet ur the one putting chemicals in the water turning frogs gay
  6. Forum:General Discussion

    Thread:Arizona Election Proven Stolen

    Thread Author:Voss

    Post Author:Firebringer

    Replies
    41
    Views
    4,230

    ►►Re: Arizona Election Proven Stolen◄◄

    So audit results were that there was a lot of fraud/discrepencies, but not enough to swing the state. Am i getting it right, im way too lazy to actually look into this.

    Even if audit result told us the state should have went to Trump, it wouldn't change anything.
  7. Forum:General Discussion

    Thread:The meaning of Intelligence

    Thread Author:Helz

    Post Author:Firebringer

    Replies
    30
    Views
    4,371

    ►►Re: The meaning of Intelligence◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by OzyWho View Post
    Actually, linguistic skills are also commonly measured in traditional IQ tests.
    How is that separated from pattern recognition.
  8. Replies
    13
    Views
    1,569

    ►►Re: How many chances should a person be given?◄◄

    Hey Toss, been awhile we should play some games soon. I need to reinstall
  9. Forum:General Discussion

    Thread:The meaning of Intelligence

    Thread Author:Helz

    Post Author:Firebringer

    Replies
    30
    Views
    4,371

    ►►Re: The meaning of Intelligence◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by HentaiManOfPeace View Post
    IQ test is the only true form of measuring intelligence, which is different from knowledge.

    https://sifter.org/iqtest/

    Post your scores, I have 150/133.
    0/133. Makes sense. I didn't know how to submit my score.

    Ontopic: the more i grow older the more i think having a better memory is a sign of intelligence and my memory is kind of shit.

    U can be good at pattern recognition (which is really alll IQ is measuring), but have shit memory and ur IQ is fucking meaningless. If you can't retain the information/patterns u see to apply them over and over, its like having a gun with only one bullet. Sure, its nice to have if you need it but you only have one shot.
  10. Replies
    13
    Views
    1,569

    ►►Re: How many chances should a person be given?◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Helz View Post
    Paris Wilder got killed recently trying to kill some cops. The guy had been arrested 40 times with 23 felony's and was on bond for 2 more felonys with 2 more felony warrants.

    This is kind extreme but begs a very real question of 'how many chances are too many?' How many are not enough? Its not cool to throw someone in a cage without the chance for redemption but where do you draw that line and how do you justify that?
    Wait was he charged 23 times? or convicted of 23?
  11. Forum:General Discussion

    Thread:My Perma-Ban on MU

    Thread Author:Helz

    Post Author:Firebringer

    Replies
    76
    Views
    8,193

    ►►Re: My Perma-Ban on MU◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by SuperJack View Post
    Ozy is taking both sides into account like a god and being fair.
    I don't think Ozy is being fair on regards to Helz not responding to mods? From my understanding all communication was unavailable for appealing before others made a hissy fit, so his critisism that "Helz not replying to them" is strange. Or is this on the initial conversation that started it all.

    I don't know. Ozy writes in a way I don't always understand his points, and Helz points are all over the place in this thread that I don't understand what point he is trying to make. Arguments between the two don't even seem like they are in the same ballpark.

    Anyways, all this is dumb. A permaban for this shit is extremely stupid. If saying how we all think the mods are clowns making bad decisions and probably shouldn't have power to make decisions if they are going to do things like this, is a witch hunt. idk

    also ybz "We couldn't witch hunt a cucumber." lol, I will have you know I can witch hunt cucumbers very well. I turn them all into pickles.
  12. Forum:General Discussion

    Thread:My Perma-Ban on MU

    Thread Author:Helz

    Post Author:Firebringer

    Replies
    76
    Views
    8,193

    ►►Re: My Perma-Ban on MU◄◄

    How ridiculous. You know basic idea of justice is to allow for people to defend against what their accused of. Fucking gross.
  13. ►►Re: 70 million pissed off republicans and not one city burned to the ground.◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by aamirus View Post
    Could you cite your source on firebombs and plan to revolt if Biden lost?
    I don't know about threats of violence, but i will say there were hundreds of businesses boarding up their businesses in fear of Trump winning and the left rioting. All over the country you can read stories of businesses doing so. When interviewed they didn't say they were scared if Biden won. They were scared if Trump won.
  14. Replies
    45
    Views
    4,941

    ►►Re: S-FM Simple Forum Mafia(9P) WINTER 2021◄◄

    Ill play if @Helz Plays
  15. Forum:General Discussion

    Thread:FUCK TWITTER!!!

    Thread Author:Donald J. Trump

    Post Author:Firebringer

    Replies
    137
    Views
    10,945

    ►►Re: FUCK TWITTER!!!◄◄

    And you can't exactly ask an employer to give you money in crypto only because the banks have denied u service.
  16. Forum:General Discussion

    Thread:FUCK TWITTER!!!

    Thread Author:Donald J. Trump

    Post Author:Firebringer

    Replies
    137
    Views
    10,945

    ►►Re: FUCK TWITTER!!!◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by yzb25 View Post
    Not that it detracts much from your point but, afaik, bitcoin transactions are handled by a very secure system called "blockchain" where lots and lots of unrelated ppl (10s of thousands maybe, idk) are effectively processing the transactions in return for a small reward, instead of any central bank or authority. That's what ppl mean by "mining for bitcoins". No external system is required apart from for stuff like currency conversion.
    No, i am talking about companies own the exchanges where u can trade bitcoins for other currency. So while u can transact in bitcoin or w/e, you can't gain access to say USD and only exchange again with people using more crypto
  17. Forum:General Discussion

    Thread:FUCK TWITTER!!!

    Thread Author:Donald J. Trump

    Post Author:Firebringer

    Replies
    137
    Views
    10,945

    ►►Re: FUCK TWITTER!!!◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by oops_ur_dead View Post
    Yes.



    If an app/service/community kicks off people I agree with, to the point that it affects me or it becomes clear that they're pushing some sort of agenda, I stop using it. I have been in this situation before and my opinion has not changed. I might even complain, but I won't say that said bias should be illegal or be enforced against in any way.

    This guy in the thread who sounds a lot like Mag, but isn't because Mag would never do something like create an alt account, seems to only care about this issue to the extent that they're censoring conservatives, and in addition actually does want some form of legal action to be taken.
    I wonder if your stance will change once someone is completely exiled from ability to engage in business because tech giants decide "we don't like what you say". Like not saying it has happened now. But lets say banks, payment processors, etc decide "you can't use our service". At what point is that going to be unacceptable? If i can't use a bank, can't transact (as far as im aware cryptocurrency exchanges are completely controlled by Mastercard? Someone correct me if i am dumb on that).

    Do we just create a separate economy for the social outcasts?
    I genuinely want to know cause i don't know the line between "businesses are free to associate with whoever they want" and all these companies getting together saying "we will not give you access to the basic tools you need to live in this world".

    I lean more on the side of forcing companies to do business with X is oppressive
  18. Forum:General Discussion

    Thread:FUCK TWITTER!!!

    Thread Author:Donald J. Trump

    Post Author:Firebringer

    Replies
    137
    Views
    10,945

    ►►Re: FUCK TWITTER!!!◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by oops_ur_dead View Post
    Btw, both Biden and Trump have stated that they want to repeal Section 230. I suspect that is why tech companies showed restraint in their actions against Trump until very recently. Though I don't know why Trump would have wanted to repeal it since it likely would have put even more pressure on Twitter to get rid of him. I suspect that it's because he's actually, contrary to popular belief, a fucking dumbass.
    Not only trump and biden. The big tech companies are fine with revisions and new regulation. They will be the ones deciding the regulations btw for those who think "we need more regulations on these tech giants!" for those screeching that 230 is bad. The replacement is going to be hell of a lot worse with both tech, both sides of aisle supporting it (who btw have no clue how any of this works because almost all politicians are boomers who can barely work a damn computer). What we will get is regulation favoring the tech giants, it will be harder for new competitors to enter the arena as it already is. See actions forcing parler off the internet when these companies coordinaate and decide "we don't want you here".

    internet is only gonna get worse lol.
  19. Forum:General Discussion

    Thread:FUCK TWITTER!!!

    Thread Author:Donald J. Trump

    Post Author:Firebringer

    Replies
    137
    Views
    10,945

    ►►Re: FUCK TWITTER!!!◄◄

    Wow Parler. What shitty false advertising platform.
  20. Forum:General Discussion

    Thread:FUCK TWITTER!!!

    Thread Author:Donald J. Trump

    Post Author:Firebringer

    Replies
    137
    Views
    10,945

    ►►Re: FUCK TWITTER!!!◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Renegade View Post
    Ya'll keep saying FREEZEPEACH but I don't think you have a damn clue what that even is.

    Free speech isn't the ability to say whatever the fuck you want on a social media platform. If you can't understand that then you are really lost and will continue to be utterly disappointed
    Are you talking about the law or the principle.
  21. Forum:General Discussion

    Thread:FUCK TWITTER!!!

    Thread Author:Donald J. Trump

    Post Author:Firebringer

    Replies
    137
    Views
    10,945

    ►►Re: FUCK TWITTER!!!◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Renegade View Post
    If they were lead by supremacists I wouldn't be on their platform. Kind of why I question if I should even have an account here.

    It is also why I'm not interested in a Parler or Gab account. Both of those cites censor the left quickly despite what they say and they are allowed to.

    If twitter wants to ban the libs then I would be fine with that. They are a business. I'll stand by that too. I won't cry about censorship.
    Can u link me to censorship on either Gab or Parler.

    I don't use either. Ive never heard this claim before.
  22. Forum:General Discussion

    Thread:FUCK TWITTER!!!

    Thread Author:Donald J. Trump

    Post Author:Firebringer

    Replies
    137
    Views
    10,945

    ►►Re: FUCK TWITTER!!!◄◄

    I understand that none of these platforms are breaking laws by kicking people off them.

    But the heart of the question is do you think if we had it so these companies were led by extreme racists/white supremecists. Lets say they kick off anyone who says anything bad about the police, the government, and only whites.

    Would you still have the stance of "These companies can do what they want".

    If u are fine with people getting kicked off because you don't give a shit about their speech, but care when they kick someone off for speech u agree with, then its not about "they have the right to do this!" its about "they are doing something i support because X speech is bad".

    These companies can do this. It is their right. We can criticize them for their actions and anti free speech principles they stand for. I think those who are for it should just admit they are against free speech as a principle instead of obfuscating that "THEY ARENT DOING ANYTHING IILLEGAL!"
  23. Forum:General Discussion

    Thread:FUCK TWITTER!!!

    Thread Author:Donald J. Trump

    Post Author:Firebringer

    Replies
    137
    Views
    10,945

    ►►Re: FUCK TWITTER!!!◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Renegade View Post
    its so annying to see this image in every discussion about free speech
  24. ►►Re: 70 million pissed off republicans and not one city burned to the ground.◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by SuperJack View Post
    I believe that trying to figure out which is worse is difficult, because of how you measure it and what they stand for.

    BML where riots and protests against their belief police brutality and racism.
    Capitol riots and protests where for the belief of a fraudulent election.

    BML where long lasting protests which a minority abused to riot and loot
    Capitol where a short-term protest which a minority abused to invade the Capitol.

    BML damaged peoples lives and lively hood.
    Capitol damaged democracy and the country's foundations.



    So, what is worse it is totally depend on how you measure it and what your opinion is in what is more important. And to argue is only really a aggressive way to tell someone what opinion more important.
    Yeah the comparison of the two isn't fair. But that will not stop people from making one or being hypocritical about one of these events to support their team.

    If you are right wing and supporting this riot but were hyper critical of riots pre election you better have a good reason why one was okay and other not. Because if its about scale/damage I think you will always argue on those lines and theres no true line your drawing in the sand and probably always moving goalpost. If you are arguing about the foundations of the initial protest being valid (racism and police brutality vs fraudulent election) you are just admitting your political beliefs have more standing to do as you please than others and thus you never cared about riots being bad.
  25. ►►Re: 70 million pissed off republicans and not one city burned to the ground.◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by oops_ur_dead View Post
    Why is it that every single thread about some criticism of the right always turns into deflections and whataboutisms? I see this constantly.

    The BLM protests/riots aren't even relevant to the discussion at hand, why are they being brought up?
    The initial post was mocking the rights thing about antifa being violent protestors. To not expect backlash from right wingers or them to point out cases where left wing were violent is like so many layers of delusional i don't even know where to begin.
  26. Replies
    2,690
    Views
    194,611

    ►►Re: S-FM 313: Mushroom Kingdom Madness II◄◄

    ftr i made 2 claims on day 2 to make it look like i couldn't be mario and was fake claiming to scum; unfortunately no town picked up on it to help CC and shield me. and after day 2 i was like okay i guess im confirmed anad gonna be blocked not gonna change anything.
  27. Replies
    2,690
    Views
    194,611

    ►►Re: S-FM 313: Mushroom Kingdom Madness II◄◄

    i think baker did better than bruno. especially later game but i guess considering how game changing day 1 bowser lynch is maybe not overstatement that bruno did really well.

    i was very ineffective. Thx for the carry folks
  28. Replies
    2,690
    Views
    194,611

    ►►Re: S-FM 313: Mushroom Kingdom Madness II◄◄

    okay i am ending this day;

    dont think this ends game but w/e

    -vote Whysper


    Cya
  29. Replies
    2,690
    Views
    194,611

    ►►Re: S-FM 313: Mushroom Kingdom Madness II◄◄

    Man i havent been lynching any scum.

    I remember being good at mafia at one point.

    -unvote
  30. Replies
    2,690
    Views
    194,611

    ►►Re: S-FM 313: Mushroom Kingdom Madness II◄◄

    -vote Marshmallow Marshall

    Maybe I was right yesterday
  31. Replies
    2,690
    Views
    194,611

    ►►Re: S-FM 313: Mushroom Kingdom Madness II◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike View Post
    I am the one who Stood up for DM and Martian and Fire. Now fire scum reads me. I am the one who stood up for Rene. Yes I questioned him at first but I was sus of him but when I saw he was real How he did give all his reads in the screw up he did I saw I was wrong.

    I Was Agreeing with Kenny. Notice how All the town who ened up agreeing with me DIED.

    Fire you got me peged Let me pocket a player then kill the one I pocket SMart...

    Fire Fucking Check ME

    I have tryed to help town.

    Yes I was wrong on Baker. But I honestly Thought he was MAfia. And like I said before if you had him town core I call Bullshit. Baker was majorly scummy.
    If I am scum I would know baker was not mafia and I would never tunnel him this hard. WHY!!! IT is Baker no offence. But If anyone I would have pushed the PR roles when baker was already on them.

    Zone I would have not voted with kenny and helped start the Zone train.
    Gyr I would have easily Not voted and Pushed a world that rene was fake I was the one actively pushing the world he was real. WHY THE FUCK WOULD I THRU THIS HARD AS SCUM?????????

    CHECK MY FUCKING ASS TONIGHT BOTH OF YOU!!!!!! THIS WAY IF ONE OF YOU GETS RB THE OTHER WILLL GET A REAL CHECK AND WE CAN GET OFF THIS FUCKING MIKE IS NEUTRAL DAY 1 MIKE IS MAFIA THE REST OF DAYS!!!

    I AM FUCKING TOWN
    This convinced me.
  32. Replies
    2,690
    Views
    194,611

    ►►Re: S-FM 313: Mushroom Kingdom Madness II◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike View Post
    OK all game I have been getting scum painted by mafia. I FUCKING AM NOT MAFIA CHECK ME I HAVE ASKED TO BE CHECKED SEVREAL TIMES...

    I have been trying to figure out this game. I have been on all MAfia lynches People still think I am mafia WTF!!!! FUCK YOU ALL GROW A PAIR OF FUCKING BALLS AND VOTE MY ASS THEN !!!

    KNOW THIS FACT I AM TOWN I AM NOT MAIFA BUT VOTE ME BECAUSE I AM STARTING TO GET SICK AND TIRED OF HELPING TOWN KILL MAFIA AND THEN BE SCUM PAINTED THIS WHOLE GAME IT WILL HONESTLY BE MORE FUN TO WATCH THAN PLAY AT THIS POINT!!!!

    VOTE MIKE
    woah calm down dude
  33. Replies
    2,690
    Views
    194,611

    ►►Re: S-FM 313: Mushroom Kingdom Madness II◄◄

    or aat least gry talking to Mike not really other way
  34. Replies
    2,690
    Views
    194,611

    ►►Re: S-FM 313: Mushroom Kingdom Madness II◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Marshmallow Marshall View Post
    Because Mike can't be Koopa because of associations (if he is, well shit, good job scum), and yet he's acting really weird (his weird 180 about his read on me, his unexplained push on baker, his half-assed way of announcing he was doused in the middle of a list of reads or something like that). The last two choices are arsonist or... severely underperforming townie.

    I'm telling you he is lol
    i found mike interactions with gry kind of opposite of this
  35. Replies
    2,690
    Views
    194,611

    ►►Re: S-FM 313: Mushroom Kingdom Madness II◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by FrostByte View Post
    @Firebringer Do we have any mechanical way to confirm your really early and really bold Mario claim?
    you need to have someone CC my claim in order to start questioning this.
  36. Replies
    2,690
    Views
    194,611

    ►►Re: S-FM 313: Mushroom Kingdom Madness II◄◄

    i haven't been on a single scum lynch this game so i dont feel sure MM is a scum lynch especially since i was voting him at EOD.
  37. Replies
    2,690
    Views
    194,611

    ►►Re: S-FM 313: Mushroom Kingdom Madness II◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Renegade View Post
    I'd be down for MM today and check Mike tonight.
    Why u think its MM over Mike
  38. Forum:General Discussion

    Thread:Occupations

    Thread Author:Bruno

    Post Author:Firebringer

    Replies
    69
    Views
    34,238

    ►►Re: Occupations◄◄

    i am an accountant with a fortune 500 company, i keep track of expenditures, balancing accounts, and ensuring financial reporting accuracy and compliance. Most of my days are spent validating data to ensure other managers can reliably trust the reports my department sends to them. I am trying to move over into doing more audit work specificall, i got a connect at deloitte hoping that will pan out soon that might get me job doing technology audits for software at big companies, to ensure all the data driven software is trustworthy for financial reporting and other parts of businesses.
  39. Replies
    2,690
    Views
    194,611

    ►►Re: S-FM 313: Mushroom Kingdom Madness II◄◄

    Mike looks way worse on grylander posting than MM does.
  40. Replies
    2,690
    Views
    194,611

    ►►Re: S-FM 313: Mushroom Kingdom Madness II◄◄

    so is it MM or Mike.

    I am too lazy to read interactions. I bet Grylander gives it away pretty easily tho

    i was also roleblocked.
  41. Replies
    2,690
    Views
    194,611

    ►►Re: S-FM 313: Mushroom Kingdom Madness II◄◄

    -vote Marshmallow Marshall


    everyone putting MM in lists but no one lynching. Weird
  42. Replies
    2,690
    Views
    194,611

    ►►Re: S-FM 313: Mushroom Kingdom Madness II◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike View Post
    Who did you check?
    i didn't get action in on time and i was roleblocked so it doesnt even matter.
  43. Replies
    2,690
    Views
    194,611

    ►►Re: S-FM 313: Mushroom Kingdom Madness II◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike View Post
    I know you are town but me and MM here never. Did you forget I helped push the Vote on Zone with Kenny.
    do u think MM is likely

    i dont remember u pushing zone no
  44. Replies
    2,690
    Views
    194,611

    ►►Re: S-FM 313: Mushroom Kingdom Madness II◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by FrostByte View Post
    Bake is trying soooo hard to derail lynch on them.

    Don't think I've forgotten about your scumminess, bake. Ceko was an easier lynch yesterday and he was actively lying and spreading misinfo so he was more of a priority.

    You're being more subtle about your bullshit but I see it.

    Bake needs to go today and MM after.

    MM is too intelligent and too good at FM to keep playing this "derr I didn't read good" card. He's scumpainting based on bullshit and subtlely trying to spread misinformation. He just used that excuse one too many times.

    -vote Bakermir
    Random thought:
    What if its MM and Mike
  45. Replies
    2,690
    Views
    194,611

    ►►Re: S-FM 313: Mushroom Kingdom Madness II◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by bakermir View Post
    the moment I publicly mention a possiblity of frostbyte being scum here based on LAMIST posts and being a bystander, i get their vote.

    I am on the right track here.
    it aint frost and mike.

    if its one its mike doing the "protect the townie" thing.

    Anyways..

    I am not certain who to vote maybe i should parse my read list quick
  46. Replies
    2,690
    Views
    194,611

    ►►Re: S-FM 313: Mushroom Kingdom Madness II◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Marshmallow Marshall View Post
    W H Y

    What's up with people not explaining their votes??


    Also:

    - Fuck majority mushrooms, @Voss is RIGHT
    - Ceko played like town lynching him was bad
    - If Ceko flipped as standard Toadstool, then someone else needs to have changed role
    - Why is this thing still alive and why are people still pushing baker
    -vote Bahkieh
    I kind of feel this vote. But at same time i wonder why.
  47. Replies
    2,690
    Views
    194,611

    ►►Re: S-FM 313: Mushroom Kingdom Madness II◄◄

    hello, i got roleblocked again.

    scum keep giving no info kills.
  48. Replies
    2,690
    Views
    194,611

    ►►Re: S-FM 313: Mushroom Kingdom Madness II◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by FrostByte View Post
    Could be hammer bro, Daisy, or whatever town rb.

    Or you could be full of shit.
    why would town roleblock me.
  49. Replies
    2,690
    Views
    194,611

    ►►Re: S-FM 313: Mushroom Kingdom Madness II◄◄

    i really wanted to fake feedback just to fuck with scum team.

    but w/e ill just claim my real results:
    i was roleblocked while checking baker.
  50. Replies
    2,690
    Views
    194,611

    ►►Re: S-FM 313: Mushroom Kingdom Madness II◄◄

    i want to lynch baker but that wagon has stalled.
Results 1 to 50 of 2000
Page 1 of 40 1 2 3 4