Search:

[QUOTE=Rachyl;783858]Nobody plays this game with the intention of actually gamethrowing! At least i dont, it happens on accident when i get really frustrated. expecially with losers like Exeter whose sole gole in this life is to report people on mafia, hes pathetic, and hes also a bullly and a complete coward. who picks on a girl? A COWARD!!!!!!![/QUOTE]

Don't blame me for reporting you when you break the rules. Blame yourself for breaking the rules in the first place.

*commits a crime* "Fuck the police for arresting me."

Given your long history of offenses, you can't plead that it was an accident. You should've known better. After a point it stops being "an accident" and becomes "wilful ignorance".

[QUOTE=Rachyl;783860]SHUT UP YOU STUPID IDIOT, MIND YOUR OWN FUCKING BUSINESS, IM DEALING WITH ARROW NOW, IM NOT DEALING WITH YOU., IM DEALING WITH ARROW. SO SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU LITTLE BULLY ASS COWARD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![/QUOTE]

My report, my business.

[QUOTE=Rachyl;783859]I WANT AN APPEAL. ARROW WILL BE REVIEWING THE REPLAYS WHEN HE GETS HOME! I MESSAGED HIM, HES ON HIS CELLPHONE. SO EVERYONE BACK THE FUCK OFF. WERE GOING TO FIND OUT WHO RACHYL WEISS REALLY IS![/QUOTE]

Even if you're not Rachyl Weiss, it doesn't matter. That report was only relevant because it was part of your track record, which was taken into account when deciding your punishment. Even discounting that one report, you still have a long history of past offenses.

Many minus one is still many, it's not going to change your punishment lol.

[MENTION=4902]Arrow[/MENTION]

Originally Posted by Rachyl

Nobody plays this game with the intention of actually gamethrowing! At least i dont, it happens on accident when i get really frustrated. expecially with losers like Exeter whose sole gole in this life is to report people on mafia, hes pathetic, and hes also a bullly and a complete coward. who picks on a girl? A COWARD!!!!!!!

Don't blame me for reporting you when you break the rules. Blame yourself for breaking the rules in the first place.

*commits a crime* "Fuck the police for arresting me."

Given your long history of offenses, you can't plead that it was an accident. You should've known better. After a point it stops being "an accident" and becomes "wilful ignorance".

Originally Posted by Rachyl

SHUT UP YOU STUPID IDIOT, MIND YOUR OWN FUCKING BUSINESS, IM DEALING WITH ARROW NOW, IM NOT DEALING WITH YOU., IM DEALING WITH ARROW. SO SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU LITTLE BULLY ASS COWARD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

My report, my business.

Originally Posted by Rachyl

I WANT AN APPEAL. ARROW WILL BE REVIEWING THE REPLAYS WHEN HE GETS HOME! I MESSAGED HIM, HES ON HIS CELLPHONE. SO EVERYONE BACK THE FUCK OFF. WERE GOING TO FIND OUT WHO RACHYL WEISS REALLY IS!

Even if you're not Rachyl Weiss, it doesn't matter. That report was only relevant because it was part of your track record, which was taken into account when deciding your punishment. Even discounting that one report, you still have a long history of past offenses.

Many minus one is still many, it's not going to change your punishment lol.

@Arrow

[QUOTE=Rachyl;783430]WAIT now i know exactly what happened!!!! the game previously before we played this game Exeter said "oh god" thats how i knew it was him! I didnt hack! now please appeal and reverse my perma ban this is dumb!!![/QUOTE]

This is her appeal and it's rubbish. You can instantly identify a player beyond any doubt for saying a commonly-used phrase [I]once, and nothing else[/I]?

If her appeal actually gets considered based on this point, I'm gonna go back and find the "previous game" replay that she's talking about, just to see if there's any validity to her argument.

Personally, I think it's her responsibility to provide proof, since she's the one making the appeal, and evidence is readily available (auto-saved replays).

[QUOTE=Rachyl;783431][COLOR="#FF0000"]and the "gamethrowing" accusation is stupid because i know other players that reveal theyre triad on the stand because they got caught. [B]that isnt even gamethrowing![/B][/COLOR] thats stupid! and the least you could say this is griefing thats all. [/QUOTE]

[SPOILER=From the rules section]
Crime: Intentional Game-Throwing
[COLOR="#FF0000"][B]This is intentionally playing to lose.[/B][/COLOR]
Example: A Mafioso giving out the names of his fellow Mafia to the town during his trial.
Type: Intentional
[/SPOILER]

In her attempt to push a lynch on me, she implicitly revealed and confirmed her alignment as Triad. She didn't care about winning, she just wanted me dead. It's gamethrowing because she was playing to lose. She was willing to die on D2, robbing the Triad of one teammate, just to carry out her vendetta.

It is [I]also[/I] griefing, but that doesn't mean it's not gamethrowing - they're not mutually exclusive offenses.

[QUOTE=Rachyl;783431]exeter is so mad that i exist and he wants me dead in real life.[/QUOTE]

Like this is even relevant. Maybe she should focus on defending her actions and clearing any misconceptions that we had, rather than try to shift the blame to the accuser.

However, this doesn't cloud my judgement about her other points. I'm just pointing out how irrelevant it is.

Originally Posted by Rachyl

WAIT now i know exactly what happened!!!! the game previously before we played this game Exeter said "oh god" thats how i knew it was him! I didnt hack! now please appeal and reverse my perma ban this is dumb!!!

This is her appeal and it's rubbish. You can instantly identify a player beyond any doubt for saying a commonly-used phrase once, and nothing else?

If her appeal actually gets considered based on this point, I'm gonna go back and find the "previous game" replay that she's talking about, just to see if there's any validity to her argument.

Personally, I think it's her responsibility to provide proof, since she's the one making the appeal, and evidence is readily available (auto-saved replays).

Originally Posted by Rachyl

and the "gamethrowing" accusation is stupid because i know other players that reveal theyre triad on the stand because they got caught. that isnt even gamethrowing! thats stupid! and the least you could say this is griefing thats all.

Spoiler : From the rules section :

Crime: Intentional Game-Throwing
This is intentionally playing to lose.
Example: A Mafioso giving out the names of his fellow Mafia to the town during his trial.
Type: Intentional

In her attempt to push a lynch on me, she implicitly revealed and confirmed her alignment as Triad. She didn't care about winning, she just wanted me dead. It's gamethrowing because she was playing to lose. She was willing to die on D2, robbing the Triad of one teammate, just to carry out her vendetta.

It is also griefing, but that doesn't mean it's not gamethrowing - they're not mutually exclusive offenses.

Originally Posted by Rachyl

exeter is so mad that i exist and he wants me dead in real life.

Like this is even relevant. Maybe she should focus on defending her actions and clearing any misconceptions that we had, rather than try to shift the blame to the accuser.

However, this doesn't cloud my judgement about her other points. I'm just pointing out how irrelevant it is.