Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Frinckles
I'm pretty sure douse checker clears someone tomorrow or says someone isnt doused giving us a possible two clears. We don't have last wills.
Clear in this sense means they're going to fucking die.
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Frinckles
Arsonist cannot cc them.
Arsonist could potentially CC or claim first, but we wouldn't know who is good or bad unless we lynched both.
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Varcron
Arsonist could potentially CC or claim first, but we wouldn't know who is good or bad unless we lynched both.
That's my point. If doused checker claims early enough (which is tomorrow) they clear themselves and one other possibly. If an Arsonist cc'd as early as tomorrow, I believe it's auto win.
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Frinckles
That's my point. If doused checker claims early enough (which is tomorrow) they clear themselves and one other possibly. If an Arsonist cc'd as early as tomorrow, I believe it's auto win.
Not necessarily, because we would still need to at least 2 days worth of executions, which gives room for 3 or 4 deaths via fire.
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Varcron
Not necessarily, because we would still need to at least 2 days worth of executions, which gives room for 3 or 4 deaths via fire.
Who's math is off here
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Frinckles
I was actually gonna say this is kind of boring, what's our strategy here
I think the strategy here is simple. Today, us civilians should be as productive as possible. At least discussion wise. The more discussion we have, the more we are able to help the douse checker make educated selections when they choose who to visit.
To the douse checker - If you find someone who is doused, based on how I interpreted the setup, it's safe to conclude that person is not the Arsonist, as the arsonist can't douse themselves. Pity no last wills
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Frinckles
I'm pretty sure douse checker clears someone tomorrow or says someone isnt doused giving us a possible two clears. We don't have last wills.
Ah.
That’s a death sentence.
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Frinckles
Clear in this sense means they're going to fucking die.
You must understand, Death is the true test.
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Frinckles
That's my point. If doused checker claims early enough (which is tomorrow) they clear themselves and one other possibly. If an Arsonist cc'd as early as tomorrow, I believe it's auto win.
That strategy is controversial.
That’s how a douse checker foolishly meets their end.
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Caustic
That strategy is controversial.
That’s how a douse checker foolishly meets their end.
Unless needed too, I don't think the douse checker should out themselves.
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Toad
Unless needed too, I don't think the douse checker should out themselves.
And by need, I mean you're at L-1 or slightly before
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Toad
Unless needed too, I don't think the douse checker should out themselves.
I completely agree with your conclusion.
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Caustic
I completely agree with your conclusion.
I thought Caustic of all people would be the most open to increasing our chances in a process of elimination.
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Frinckles
I thought Caustic of all people would be the most open to increasing our chances in a process of elimination.
But you are simply allowing the Parasite to eliminate it’s biggest threat.
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Caustic
But you are simply allowing the Parasite to eliminate it’s biggest threat.
That implies the Arsonist has doused the Douse checker. If the douse checker finds who is doused, we're ahead and have two confirmed players.
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Frinckles
That implies the Arsonist has doused the Douse checker. If the douse checker finds who is doused, we're ahead and have two confirmed players.
Luck. An important factor in many games.
Relying on such things is Incriminating.
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Frinckles
Who's math is off here
My math wouldn't be off, N0 douse, N1 douse N2 douse+ douse checker lynch N3 burn
4 people dead
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Caustic
Luck. An important factor in many games.
Relying on such things is Incriminating.
Probability. And we have a better probability.
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Varcron
My math wouldn't be off, N0 douse, N1 douse N2 douse+ douse checker lynch N3 burn
4 people dead
Then doesn't it work better for us if we no-lynch?