-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Little over 8 hours left, ladies and gentlemen
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
Little over 8 hours left, ladies and gentlemen
Perhaps it’s time to vote an unknown variable.
-vote Varcron
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Marshmallow Marshall
By the way, I find Toad quite towny here. Of course, it's only early D1, so my read might change, but he's doing exactly what I'd expect a townie to do. To some extent, Frinckles is, too, it's just that I disagree with his plan, but that's probably just a theory disagreement, and therefore NAI.
:town:
Toad
Frinckles
Maybe Caustic?
Also,
-vote Kovath
I think Caustic doesn't need pressure, as long as he contributes constantly.
-vote Marshmallow Marshall
I am going to purposefully not explain why I am voting you for a moment.
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
Little over 8 hours left, ladies and gentlemen
what the fuck
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
it really do be 24 hour days
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
@BananaCucho
Is lynch majority or plurality?
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
-unvote
Yeah never mind I don't have time for gimmicks. 24 hour days is faster than I expected and we have literally no content in the thread.
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Stealthbomber16
Majority. Day can end without a lynch.
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
Majority. Day can end without a lynch.
I honestly feel like no lynch is a valid option here.
1 of 2 scenarios happen.
1. Someone dies. This is fine because we have literally nothing to work with right now.
2. Douse checker checks somebody, and two people are doused. This is fine because then we will have a mechanical read on someone and we can move forward and we'll have two days worth of stuff to analyze tomorrow.
also consider 3. where i die and am sad
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Stealthbomber16
Or we just lynch the arsonist today and banana is sad
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Stealthbomber16
I honestly feel like no lynch is a valid option here.
1 of 2 scenarios happen.
1. Someone dies. This is fine because we have literally nothing to work with right now.
2. Douse checker checks somebody, and two people are doused. This is fine because then we will have a mechanical read on someone and we can move forward and we'll have two days worth of stuff to analyze tomorrow.
also consider 3. where i die and am sad
Make up your mind. ( ・ั﹏・ั) SB16 D1 finna be real soon.
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Stealthbomber16
Or we just lynch the arsonist today and banana is sad
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Stealthbomber16
I honestly feel like no lynch is a valid option here.
1 of 2 scenarios happen.
1. Someone dies. This is fine because we have literally nothing to work with right now.
2. Douse checker checks somebody, and two people are doused. This is fine because then we will have a mechanical read on someone and we can move forward and we'll have two days worth of stuff to analyze tomorrow.
also consider 3. where i die and am sad
E N H A N C E
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
I do not feel comfortable enough to place a vote today.
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Stealthbomber16
I do not feel comfortable enough to place a vote today.
I think a null read lynch makes sense.
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Actually yeah, Kovath / Varcron I'm okay with.
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Frinckles
Actually yeah, Kovath / Varcron I'm okay with.
I just feel really lost right now because almost 24 hours have passed and we've gotten... 115 posts.
Thats not enough for me to make reads.
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Toad
I didnt say he was a confirm top read for me. I just said I like the man
Fair.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Toad
Sorry, it's 2020. I forgot I can't assume people's gender.
Feel free to assume mine. And you're right that he's a he lol
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Caustic
Perhaps it’s time to vote an unknown variable.
-vote Varcron
I concur. -vote Varcron
L-2 because we need to start SOMETHING to have info, be it a lynch or a no lynch, but at least some wagon with action. I won't stop anyone from hammering
@Varcron
, a slot that has been 100 % devoid of life.
~~
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Stealthbomber16
-vote Marshmallow Marshall
I am going to purposefully not explain why I am voting you for a moment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Stealthbomber16
what the fuck
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Stealthbomber16
it really do be 24 hour days
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Stealthbomber16
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Stealthbomber16
-unvote
Yeah never mind I don't have time for gimmicks. 24 hour days is faster than I expected and we have literally no content in the thread.
I'll wait a bit before giving you a read for this. It could be towny, but it doesn't SCREAM town like what you usually do so ill wait.
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Frinckles
I think a null read lynch makes sense.
That too, because taking null reads to LYLO sucks. The wisdom of a lot of sites is speaking through your words and mine :P
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Stealthbomber16
I just feel really lost right now because almost 24 hours have passed and we've gotten... 115 posts.
Thats not enough for me to make reads.
Yep, that's why I don't like 24 hours days (and because sometimes people just can't be there much/at all in 24 hours). I wish the host would take petitions on the matter.
pssh pssh banana psshhhh
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Marshmallow Marshall
Yep, that's why I don't like 24 hours days (and because sometimes people just can't be there much/at all in 24 hours). I wish the host would take petitions on the matter.
pssh pssh banana psshhhh
Well, I dont dislike it. We just need to make decisions quicker and towntell faster. I'll sheep your vote on Varcron for now I think but I'd rather lynch Kovath with one post. [Vote]Varcron[/varcron]
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Wow I butchered that vote. -vote Varcron
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Yeah I love Kovath but I'm not taking a null far in this one and it seems like a setup where arsonist lays low
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Caustic
Perhaps it’s time to vote an unknown variable.
-vote Varcron
Unknown variable? I made my points very clear early in the day today for you to see my stance. We can't afford a wrong lynch in this set up, especially if it forces douse checker to be outed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshmallow Marshall
I concur.
-vote Varcron
L-2 because we need to start SOMETHING to have info, be it a lynch or a no lynch, but at least some wagon with action. I won't stop anyone from hammering @Varcron , a slot that has been 100 % devoid of life.
Maybe devoid since you hopped in, but there is no reason to give out a bad lynch, it only helps arso, not us.
In terms of Townies, I see a few people that stand out
Frinkles
State Puff Marshmallow Man
Maybe Toad
Maybe Caustic
I have problems reading Kovath and Stealth, so i'll leave that up to you guys, the two maybes i'm sort of on the fence with.
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
I completely forgot but -unvote
We need to narrow down our options before we start going out on people.
EDIT: It has no benefit to us to lynch a townie D1 other than a 1/7 chance of taking out arso.
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Ok I think those two posts are a good enough indicator for me that I definitely don't want Varcron to be lynched today.
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Marshmallow Marshall
Frinckles
Varcron
Toad
Caustic
Korvath
Okay I think I feel a bit better about this now.
Yellows are in no particular order.
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
I will go with -vote Kovath
for the moment.
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Stealthbomber16
I will go with
-vote Kovath
for the moment.
Any particular reason for Kovath? I've seen no real scumtell or town tell from him so far.
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Varcron
Any particular reason for Kovath? I've seen no real scumtell or town tell from him so far.
I feel more comfortable voting Kovath than Caustic and more comfortable voting Caustic than Toad.
Dude has not actually done, well, anything?
I want to put my vote here and see what happens, if anything, and I will revisit it in 2-3 hours when we're really close to EoD.
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Stealthbomber16
I feel more comfortable voting Kovath than Caustic and more comfortable voting Caustic than Toad.
Dude has not actually done, well, anything?
I want to put my vote here and see what happens, if anything, and I will revisit it in 2-3 hours when we're really close to EoD.
Pretty fair choice, I'll leave my vote out of this for now until I see a reason to put it in.
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
By the way, I will NOT be here for EoD.
And I've seen good posts from Varcron that really make me want him to live at least today, maybe put him in town -unvote
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
I think it's good if we vote today. I could go for a Kovath lynch, he hasn't participated.
It's good to narrow down the pool, perhaps even lynch someone who may have been doused... although we don't know who that was, still could happen
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Toad
I think it's good if we vote today. I could go for a Kovath lynch, he hasn't participated.
It's good to narrow down the pool, perhaps even lynch someone who may have been doused... although we don't know who that was, still could happen
And make it easier for arso to win? unlikely... The only person who desperately wants someone lynched is you, so with that in mind
-vote Toad
I find it really sus that you're pushing a person (even an inactive one) with no certain lead other than to "narrow" down the pool.
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Varcron
And make it easier for arso to win? unlikely... The only person who desperately wants someone lynched is you, so with that in mind
-vote Toad
I find it really sus that you're pushing a person (even an inactive one) with no certain lead other than to "narrow" down the pool.
Desperately is definitely an overstatement. But okay, as you wish.
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Kovath might be good to have around if he's town however.
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
We've solved mysteries before.
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
We have a little over an hour here.
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
I think we can no lynch and be fine here. It gives arsonist another douse but I dont want to risk Kovath being douse checker or anyone really. My plan actually works here.
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Not much new content to go over, so I guess we'll wait till next day then?
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
In my opinion, town benefits the most from a lynch. Ideally there would have been more conversation today but you have to remember that the Arsonist had the first move last night.
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Well I am really fking stupid since I assumed this was a 48-hour day.
I've had a busy day, fk me.
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
yeah alright i can respect that
-unvote
No-lynch. We'll take the extra 24 hours and the douse check.
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
I don't really like Toad from my skim of D1 but given how little was said (my fault), I doubt that's much to go on.
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Why? What don't you like?
-
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Frinckles bugs me since he didn't reciprocate my shitpost. Among other things.
Hunch is town on MM for now.