S-FM 209: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies
GROUP 1 |
GROUP 2 |
GROUP 3 |
Titus
Shapelog
Unknown1234
Klingoncelt
Alles_Paletti |
Calix
JealousTL
SuperJack
PLZLEAVEDUCKK
secondpassing |
Gingerape
Kovath
Yukitaka Oni
Never Unlucky |
When everyone has confirmed their role, and it is a good time for me to start the game, The game will start.
EOD 1:
[ecountdown]00:00:00:00[/ecountdown]
SOD 2:
[ecountdown]00:00:00:00[/ecountdown]
Day 2 post
End of DP: I: Day 2
[ecountdown]00:00:00:00[/ecountdown]
EOD DP: II:
[ecountdown]00:00:00:00[/ecountdown]
SOD 3:
[ecountdown]00:00:00:00[/ecountdown]
NEW GROUPS WILL BE GIVEN AT SOD 3!
GROUP 1 |
GROUP 2 |
Unknown1234
Titus
Gingerape
secondpassing
Shapelog
JealousTL |
PLZLEAVEDUCKK
Firebringer
Eggy
Yukitaka Oni
Klingoncelt
Calix |
End of DP: I: Day 3:
[ecountdown]01:00:00:00[/ecountdown]
Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies
Game will begin when 13/15 players have confirmed by
[countdown]01:01:50:00[/countdown]
Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies
13/15 players have confirmed.
With 3 Groups of 5 people each, it takes 8 to pick a group. 8 votes to hammer.
1.
@Never Unlucky
2.
@JealousTL
3.
@MattZed
4.
@Gingerape
5.
@Alles_Paletti
6.
@Yukitaka Oni
7.
@Shapelog
8.
@RLVG
9.
@Spruance
10.
@Slayer
11.
@Titus
12.
@PLZLEAVEDUCKK
13.
@Calix
14.
@Kovath
15.
@Klingoncelt
Game Starts now.
First half of the day ends in:
[countdown]01:00:00:00[/countdown]
Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies
-vote Group 2
I'm curious as to how good Never Unlucky is. Quick said he was good. I'm curious.
Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies
-vote Group 1
Guess this is the part where we talk about the setup? Not sure if I understand it correctly myself, but each group has 1 or 2 scum in it, right?
Assuming that's correct, we already have a lot of information about which scum teams AREN'T possible in the game.
Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies
Lucky number 13 started the game boys.
Let's go.
Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies
-vote Group 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Titus
-vote Group 2
I'm curious as to how good Never Unlucky is. Quick said he was good. I'm curious.
I can't say I'm good, but I can say that I don't have a bowl haircut.
If you're curious to see how 'good' I am, wouldn't you be voting for Group 3, my group?
Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Shapelog
Lucky number 13 started the game boys.
Let's go.
>says he wants to start the game off
>makes no attempt aside from saying "let's go" to actually get things going
Strong.
Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies
Also it doesn't look like the votes are appearing on the automated vote system.
@Quick
might want to get that checked with the admins.
Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies
Yeah if I understand it right, there is 1 scum per group. Kinda like a cell mafia (where there are 5 cells, each cell has 1.) minus having a mayor decided the order the Cells get brought up.
Also this part of the game is usually when people just post random things tills someone trys to bring discussion into the game.
ALSO IDC IF THERE ARE NEW POSTS, I DON'T WANT TO REVIEW THEM SITE!
GO AWAY, LET ME FREAKING POST THIS.
Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies
Vote count isn't working.
@Cryptonic
, can you help me out here?
Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Never Unlucky
-vote Group 1
I can't say I'm good, but I can say that I don't have a bowl haircut.
If you're curious to see how 'good' I am, wouldn't you be voting for Group 3, my group?
Nope. I find people are at their best when they aren't facing a lethal firing squad.
Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Shapelog
Yeah if I understand it right, there is 1 scum per group. Kinda like a cell mafia (where there are 5 cells, each cell has 1.) minus having a mayor decided the order the Cells get brought up.
Also this part of the game is usually when people just post random things tills someone trys to bring discussion into the game.
ALSO IDC IF THERE ARE NEW POSTS, I DON'T WANT TO REVIEW THEM SITE!
GO AWAY, LET ME FREAKING POST THIS.
One of the groups has to have two scum, so either the scum will be inclined to vote for that group (because mislynching + killing a member from that group helps them achieve their win con faster) or they'll want to avoid it to lower the odds of scum being lynched. I feel like the latter is more likely though.
You can turn off that if you go to 'settings' by the way.
Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Calix
>says he wants to start the game off
>makes no attempt aside from saying "let's go" to actually get things going
Strong.
>Complains about not wanting to do anything
>Expects me not to do anything to follow that up
>Does something to follow it up
>????
>Profit
Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies
If nothing else, I will keep track of the group votes.
Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Shapelog
>Complains about not wanting to do anything
>Expects me not to do anything to follow that up
>Does something to follow it up
>????
>Profit
Responding to my post with trolling. Noted.
Moving on. Which site do you herald from and what's the standard 'meta' over there?
Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Titus
Nope. I find people are at their best when they aren't facing a lethal firing squad.
I disagree.
People need a Barrel of a 50. Cal in their face everyday.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Calix
One of the groups has to have two scum, so either the scum will be inclined to vote for that group (because mislynching + killing a member from that group helps them achieve their win con faster) or they'll want to avoid it to lower the odds of scum being lynched. I feel like the latter is more likely though.
You can turn off that if you go to 'settings' by the way.
Oh they can different amounts? I just this was going to be like cell lol.
Do you find it strange that Group 1 has 3 votes already given the bold?
Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Shapelog
I disagree.
People need a Barrel of a 50. Cal in their face everyday.
Oh they can different amounts? I just this was going to be like cell lol.
Do you find it strange that Group 1 has 3 votes already given the bold?
If we have 4 mafia and only 3 groups then one of them HAS to have 2 scum in it.
NU and I are the only people who have voted for Group 1. Titus voted for Group 2. Given that I voted first and NU followed me (nothing unusual there) I don't consider it strange.
Why haven't you voted?
Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Shapelog
Yeah if I understand it right, there is 1 scum per group. Kinda like a cell mafia (where there are 5 cells, each cell has 1.) minus having a mayor decided the order the Cells get brought up.
Also this part of the game is usually when people just post random things tills someone trys to bring discussion into the game.
ALSO IDC IF THERE ARE NEW POSTS, I DON'T WANT TO REVIEW THEM SITE!
GO AWAY, LET ME FREAKING POST THIS.
This post gave me a Spruance/Mesk feeling...
https://i.giphy.com/x0xhJ5BZdm1A4.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Calix
-vote Group 1
Guess this is the part where we talk about the setup? Not sure if I understand it correctly myself, but each group has 1 or 2 scum in it, right?
Assuming that's correct, we already have a lot of information about which scum teams AREN'T possible in the game.
That is correct.
You're neglecting the 'Traitor' wildcard which would nuance your post.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Titus
Nope. I find people are at their best when they aren't facing a lethal firing squad.
Why though? Why would players who are safe for the day (i.e. they can't be lynched and feel no pressure) would be at their best?
Side-note: You and I have a similar avatar, you and I have similar posting styles(from what I can see so far)... I, too, am curious to see your play.
https://i.giphy.com/3WPKHcTih1xwQ.gif
Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Never Unlucky
This post gave me a Spruance/Mesk feeling...
https://i.giphy.com/x0xhJ5BZdm1A4.gif
That is correct.
You're neglecting the 'Traitor' wildcard which would nuance your post.
Why though? Why would players who are safe for the day (i.e. they can't be lynched and feel no pressure) would be at their best?
Side-note: You and I have a similar avatar, you and I have similar posting styles(from what I can see so far)... I, too, am curious to see your play.
https://i.giphy.com/3WPKHcTih1xwQ.gif
If you were lurking, it would be a scumclaim. Removing the pressure of fucking up gets more open and honest communication (by open and honest meaning your natural state, which could be a lying gambiter but you get the idea).
