But why not
Printable View
But why not
the last game had this?
"mafia loses when reduced to 1 member, and town loses when reduced to 3 members."
I do agree the game seems balanced , I just don't understand why your adding such an end gamer
A fair game - specially a nightless one gives scums a boost cause People are not robots.
but if you want math
removing one citizen (assuming everything is random and this won't be use as a tell for scum hunting - which is a faulty assumption from the core) the game is 6 v 3. Goons need to get 3 town lynched. town needs to get two scums down.
The chance of town win is = 1/12 + 2(1/14) + 3(5/84) = 0/08 + 0.14 + 0/17 = 0.39
so if thats your way for measuring balance your game is so scum sided.
My point is that percentage means absolutely nothing - as random lynching in games must be prohibited and extremely fraud upon.
but meh, I will keep my bad feeling about this to myself. It just feels bad, maybe just because its a nightless.
in case of random lynch in your 7v3 version : (town will win with 2 scum lynch/ scum will win with 4 town lynch)
town win rate = 1/15 + 2(7/120) + 3(1/20) + 4(1/24) = 0.51
you actually calculated this didn't you? :D our definitions of balance are very different but wow I respect your mathematical calculations
@deathworlds
I'd like to host this again
Hmmm, seems alright!
Approved!
@Mesk514
READY FOR SIGN UPS
LETS GO
LETS GO
LETS GO
Hold up, lemmie put it in the queue first.
Bump? Can't get into hosting atm, but this setup is kinda nice :D
By the way, I plan to start hosting stuff on summer since I don't work on that period. Can't promise you anything though.
Would also like to note, if you wish to host, but don't have the time. You can always co-host (Multiple hosts for one game) that way you will get to host, but have back up for any situations.
If I had a clue about hosting I would host this... and if I had time.