Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Frinckles
I disagree with your take on our previous game and I dont follow how you tunneled on me so hard. But that's not really the matter because it taught me something. Perhaps at some point we need to reread our town reads.
I've seen open setups with no reveal was my concern.
well I disagree with you too lol you legit ignored me and you saying that proves my point but whatever :P
Same *looks at Gyrlander*. I still note your strong mindset difference, maybe it's your town game evolving positively (imo at least, without wanting to be condescending), maybe it's just that you're scum.
Oh, ok, setups with forbidden roleclaiming like IRL werewolf games. I thought you knew, but this isn't the site's meta; if the ability to claim is not specifically removed, claiming is allowed.
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Frinckles
Because that person is immediately cleared from the process of elimination along with the checker themselves. And if the Douse checker is not doused (which is likely upon a doused check tomorrow) we gain a clear with an additional day of another streamlined PoE. No?
It's not. It's a sound plan, but if you'd prefer something else feel free to suggest it.
I admire your generosity.
Allow me to enlighten you.
We all Evaluate others statements and watch for any Behaviour they may show.
Then find the best result to satisfy a proper solution to others judgement.
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Caustic
I admire your generosity.
Allow me to enlighten you.
We all Evaluate others statements and watch for any Behaviour they may show.
Then find the best result to satisfy a proper solution to others judgement.
What is the content in that post? Did you just basically say "we need to check what people do if we want to have reads"? Because if so, it's not sooo useful...
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Marshmallow Marshall
Already started? :D
To those asking early what our strategy is, it's to scumhunt, guys. We cannot rely on the Douse Checker for "free clears". Plus, this is a 24/24 game, so we need to get into it quickly.
-vote Caustic
You are forced to give content this game. We do not have time for cryptic "variable analysis". As Kerrigan says,
I have no time for games.
Also, I see Toad and Toadette... Do these mushrooms have something with eachother? Hmm...
You made an attempt on my life. Brave perhaps, but Ill conceived.
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Marshmallow Marshall
What is the content in that post? Did you just basically say "we need to check what people do if we want to have reads"? Because if so, it's not sooo useful...
There are many factors on determining the whereabouts of a Parasite.
Hence, the behaviour of a Parasite takes a Significant factor.
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
By the way, just to clarify my playstyle, when I ask questions or pressure people, it's really nothing personal. Questions are questions, not necessarily attacks. We should all be questioning others instead of going in circles about roleclaiming in such a setup, especially with our short deadlines.
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Everything becomes clear due time.
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Caustic
You made an attempt on my life. Brave perhaps, but Ill conceived.
Not really, it's just pressure, not an attempt on anyone's life.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Caustic
There are many factors on determining the whereabouts of a Parasite.
Hence, the behaviour of a Parasite takes a Significant factor.
I didn't say it was wrong, I said it was so obvious it didn't have to be said. It's obvious even for a first-time Mafia player :P
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Marshmallow Marshall
By the way, just to clarify my playstyle, when I ask questions or pressure people, it's really nothing personal. Questions are questions, not necessarily attacks. We should all be questioning others instead of going in circles about roleclaiming in such a setup, especially with our short deadlines.
I find nothing wrong with your approach towards the process.
I respect your determination.
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
I'm not too sure what you mean by role reveal being on, or off. However, the Arsonist cannot douse themselves therefore if someone is doused it is safe to conclude they are a vanilla.
Not too sure if the douse checker can check themselves.
Like I said, and the Marshall seconded, the best thing to do here is to rely on our daily reads and work off the content that is given to us. Instead of the douse checker outting themselves, best 'bread crumb' their results.
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Marshmallow Marshall
Not really, it's just pressure, not an attempt on anyone's life.
I didn't say it was wrong, I said it was so obvious it didn't have to be said. It's obvious even for a first-time Mafia player :P
I was requested to suggest a plan.
At this point and time, the process is at its early stages.
So I came to the conclusion that I must explain how to solve the process in the simplest of terms.
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
By the way, I find Toad quite towny here. Of course, it's only early D1, so my read might change, but he's doing exactly what I'd expect a townie to do. To some extent, Frinckles is, too, it's just that I disagree with his plan, but that's probably just a theory disagreement, and therefore NAI.
:town:
Toad
Frinckles
Maybe Caustic?
Also, -vote Kovath
I think Caustic doesn't need pressure, as long as he contributes constantly.
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Well, I say "constantly" but that's relative of course, you're not expected to be contributing 24/7 xD
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Caustic
I was requested to suggest a plan.
At this point and time, the process is at its early stages.
So I came to the conclusion that I must explain how to solve the process in the simplest of terms.
The simplest of terms? You really don't have more simple terms than that? Can I doubt that lol
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Marshmallow Marshall
Well, I say "constantly" but that's relative of course, you're not expected to be contributing 24/7 xD
The simplest of terms? You really don't have more simple terms than that? Can I doubt that lol
If you wish to doubt my assumption.
That’s Understandable.
However, don’t treat me as a incompetent variable if that’s where you were going with it.
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Caustic
If you wish to doubt my assumption.
That’s Understandable.
However, don’t treat me as a incompetent variable if that’s where you were going with it.
You're not incompetent at all (as you have showed last game), which is why I want you to produce meaningful content. The post I quoted was not meaningful, because it stated something very obvious. That's all I meant.
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Marshmallow Marshall
I think Caustic doesn't need pressure, as long as he contributes constantly.
I like Caustic, they were challenging Frinckles strategy for the game in a way that aligns with my thought process.
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Toad
I like Caustic, they were challenging Frinckles strategy for the game in a way that aligns with my thought process.
I see your point and partially share it; it doesn't necessarily means that he's town, though, which is why I put a "maybe Caustic" in my town list.
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Also, WAKE UP GUYS. We will have discussed literally nothing by the time the day ends, or at least by the time I have to go. :(
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Marshmallow Marshall
I see your point and partially share it; it doesn't necessarily means that he's town, though, which is why I put a "maybe Caustic" in my town list.
I didnt say he was a confirm top read for me. I just said I like the man
Re: S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II
Sorry, it's 2020. I forgot I can't assume people's gender.