S-FM 296 Simple Arsonist II

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Frinckles

That implies the Arsonist has doused the Douse checker. If the douse checker finds who is doused, we're ahead and have two confirmed players.

---

Yes, but why must the information be shared with the rest of us? If the douse checker sees that someone is doused they can mostly conclude they are town and leave them in their top town reads. Thus if they somehow find themselves dead, we can just go back.

Heavily relying on the one power role in-game isn't the best strategy. Reads reads reads.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Frinckles

Probability. And we have a better probability.

---

Probability implies it’s a miraculous solution.
I consider this a risky Decision.

The Outcome of you method is Foolish.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Toad

Yes, but why must the information be shared with the rest of us? If the douse checker sees that someone is doused they can mostly conclude they are town and leave them in their top town reads. Thus if they somehow find themselves dead, we can just go back.

Heavily relying on the one power role in-game isn't the best strategy. Reads reads reads.

---

Because that person is immediately cleared from the process of elimination along with the checker themselves. And if the Douse checker is not doused (which is likely upon a doused check tomorrow) we gain a clear with an additional day of another streamlined PoE. No?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Caustic

The Outcome of you method is Foolish.

---

It's not. It's a sound plan, but if you'd prefer something else feel free to suggest it.

Or we just lynch the arsonist today and banana is sad

I miss pathfinder

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Stealthbomber16

I miss pathfinder

---

I WAS GONNA SAY THAT EARLIER, FRIEND

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Frinckles

Because that person is immediately cleared from the process of elimination along with the checker themselves. And if the Douse checker is not doused (which is likely upon a doused check tomorrow) we gain a clear with an additional day of another streamlined PoE. No?

---

The only person who needs to know is the douse checker. There is absolutely zero point in outting so early. As long as the douse checker knows who is clear and communicates it properly in reads, that's fine. Unless the douse checker is at risk of being lynched or knows they're going to die, there's no need to out themselves.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Toad

The only person who needs to know is the douse checker. There is absolutely zero point in outting so early. As long as the douse checker knows who is clear and communicates it properly in reads, that's fine. Unless the douse checker is at risk of being lynched or knows they're going to die, there's no need to out themselves.

---

wait is role reveal on?

I can't find anything on that.

Already started? :D

To those asking early what our strategy is, it's to scumhunt, guys. We cannot rely on the Douse Checker for "free clears". Plus, this is a 24/24 game, so we need to get into it quickly.

-vote Caustic

You are forced to give content this game. We do not have time for cryptic "variable analysis". As Kerrigan says, I have no time for games.

Also, I see Toad and Toadette... Do these mushrooms have something with eachother? Hmm...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Toad

The only person who needs to know is the douse checker. There is absolutely zero point in outting so early. As long as the douse checker knows who is clear and communicates it properly in reads, that's fine. Unless the douse checker is at risk of being lynched or knows they're going to die, there's no need to out themselves.

---

I don't know what your experience with Mafia is, but you seem to be quite enlightened. This is literally what should happen.

PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT:


The Douse Checker needs to breadcrumb his checks in reads, i.e. to leave clues that aren't directly understandable without his flip, but that will indicate us who he checked and what the result was upon checking. That would be preferably done in a list of reads, which means that E V E R Y O N E should give a list of reads tomorrow, WITHOUT ANY EXCEPTION. Please color it so that we can see it easily.

And for the love of the Cat Empress, do not claim ANYTHING unless you are the Douse Checked and are on the verge of being lynched. Any claim that does not meet those conditions IS ANTI-TOWN, because it either creates confusion about roles, which detracts from the point of the game (lynching scum), or it tells the Arsonist who to douse.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Frinckles

wait is role reveal on?

---

Uh, why wouldn't it be?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Marshmallow Marshall

Already started? :D

To those asking early what our strategy is, it's to scumhunt, guys. We cannot rely on the Douse Checker for "free clears". Plus, this is a 24/24 game, so we need to get into it quickly.

-vote Caustic

You are forced to give content this game. We do not have time for cryptic "variable analysis". As Kerrigan says, I have no time for games.

Also, I see Toad and Toadette... Do these mushrooms have something with eachother? Hmm...

---

I like this MM. I wish you were more aggressive more often. I get bored of shitposting fast.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Marshmallow Marshall

Uh, why wouldn't it be?

---

Because it isnt listed and we just played a game without role reveal?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Frinckles

I like this MM. I wish you were more aggressive more often. I get bored of shitposting fast.

---

Not to be rude, but in the previous game you said I was, and I'm quoting you here, "stupidly aggressive". :gun:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Frinckles

Because it isnt listed and we just played a game without role reveal?

---

Hm? We weren't forbidden from revealing roles, it was a hidden setup, that's all. Have you seen the setup? I don't understand your point.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Marshmallow Marshall

Not to be rude, but in the previous game you said I was, and I'm quoting you here, "stupidly aggressive". :gun:


Hm? We weren't forbidden from revealing roles, it was a hidden setup, that's all. Have you seen the setup? I don't understand your point.

---

Actually, last game, you were town. The more I think about it, the more I think you may be pocketing me because you're saying the opposite of what you said last game (even though you were wrong last game).

Also... who's Kevin in the sign list lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Marshmallow Marshall

Not to be rude, but in the previous game you said I was, and I'm quoting you here, "stupidly aggressive". :gun:


Hm? We weren't forbidden from revealing roles, it was a hidden setup, that's all. Have you seen the setup? I don't understand your point.

---

I disagree with your take on our previous game and I dont follow how you tunneled on me so hard. But that's not really the matter because it taught me something. Perhaps at some point we need to reread our town reads.

I've seen open setups with no reveal was my concern.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Marshmallow Marshall

Actually, last game, you were town. The more I think about it, the more I think you may be pocketing me because you're saying the opposite of what you said last game (even though you were wrong last game).

Also... who's Kevin in the sign list lol

---

To be honest I do weird shit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Frinckles

To be honest I do weird shit.

---

Not Magoroth weird though.