-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Distorted
well, hope that I would be there to stand up for u because im the only person standing up for SuperJack right now with that same scenario lol - so you are claiming you would do a scenario that is currently "failing".
Aparently if i were SJ it would have fooled you huh?
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
I doubt it is rumox; still. I have a proposal to make. Since 5 of us will be night immune tonight, I propose that we mass claim today - our TPRs will be protected and we will narrow the lynch pool.
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
SJ could even have scum not even do a double kill tonight and be like "See I'm not Mafia! Only one kill" then we are like ah yep he just a Citizen covering for Lurker. Night 2 comes round and bam 2 kills and SJ has more than least posts so we are like ah shit that other guy is Mafia Lurker.
Letting someone soft claim this role leaves up too much bullshit for Town to deal with
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Distorted
go back and read my posts dude lol I literally detailed EXACTLY THAT
You are in complete WIFOM mode when u talk to MM, comes off very smug lol You also instantly said when SJ said he wants lowest posts "anyone who wants lowest posts is scum" completely outting that you are going to counter claim lurker. you were not subtle about it, look at everyone elses posts as well, it HAS been between you and SJ. I am not the only person saying this lol
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
I shall start. I am Editor!
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
-vote distorted
im not buying into your scheme
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rumox
SJ could even have scum not even do a double kill tonight and be like "See I'm not Mafia! Only one kill" then we are like ah yep he just a Citizen covering for Lurker. Night 2 comes round and bam 2 kills and SJ has more than least posts so we are like ah shit that other guy is Mafia Lurker.
Letting someone soft claim this role leaves up too much bullshit for Town to deal with
Sorry let me retype that, pretty tired.
Day 1: SJ as lurker gets least posts, giving 2 KPN to Mafia.
Night 1: Mafia only perform 1 kill.
Day 2: SJ "See 1 kill I'm just Citizen"
EODay2: SJ isn't person with least posts
Night 2: Mafia perform 2 kills
Day 3: OMG that guy yesterday with least posts is Lurker!!!
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rumox
Sorry let me retype that, pretty tired.
Day 1: SJ as lurker gets least posts, giving 2 KPN to Mafia.
Night 1: Mafia only perform 1 kill.
Day 2: SJ "See 1 kill I'm just Citizen"
EODay2: SJ isn't person with least posts
Night 2: Mafia perform 2 kills
Day 3: OMG that guy yesterday with least posts is Lurker!!!
This is a very real concern.
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
meh maybe we will just disagree here on what a good strategy would be. but the fact stands the lurker needs to get lowest posts to confirm today or this kinda shit will carry into D2.
If blink is Lurker, I put a scum between mag and rumox, and I have 1 other scum thingy im keeping for now, want to watch how it plays it as well.
If rumox is scum I would be heavily susp of dutes.
If Mag is scum I would be heavily susp of....honestly no idea lol would have to reread his interactions with other ppl, but rumox is possible there because mag still wont address the interactions with rumox that ive reposted 4x now lol they seem to be ignoring eachother for the most part; rumox did a small push but quickly jumped on the next opportunity to pull that vote off.
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Magoroth
This is a very real concern.
Exactly based on Mags flip floppyness i believe him to be town and any counterclaim to his editor claim will be mafia imo
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blinkskater
Aparently if i were SJ it would have fooled you huh?
yes, because it reminds me of the same thing SCV just did last game which he got lynched for lol SJ literally just gave u cover.
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blinkskater
-vote distorted
im not buying into your scheme
scheme lol - i just do not agree with a mafia lurker outting themself as day 1 being a "pro mafia move"
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Distorted
yes, because it reminds me of the same thing SCV just did last game which he got lynched for lol SJ literally just gave u cover.
Ok Whad keep thinking im the lurker maybe my plan will end up working :) Also if i were lurker why the fuck would i want to be confirmed day 1? Thats not smart
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
You are making reads of my shit posts Distorted -_-
I was fucking around voting MM, Magoroth and Dutes which I thought was obvious. My only real vote was for goatse to get him to create a buffer between him and SJ
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blinkskater
Ok Whad keep thinking im the lurker maybe my plan will end up working :) Also if i were lurker why the fuck would i want to be confirmed day 1? Thats not smart
if ur not lurker i have a strong scum read on u lol
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Distorted
scheme lol - i just do not agree with a mafia lurker outting themself as day 1 being a "pro mafia move"
It Is Dammit Now Lynch The Squirrel
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Distorted
if ur not lurker i have a strong scum read on u lol
becaus you were also pushing for a mass rolecall, so i will not buy it AT ALL if u claim u wre trying to give cover to the lurker to fool the mafia.
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blinkskater
It Is Dammit Now Lynch The Squirrel
You still cant explain to me how it is pro mafia to have 5v1 the next day =P or potentially 6v1
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blinkskater
It Is Dammit Now Lynch The Squirrel
Are u claiming lurker or not?
-vote blinkskater
You are the 1 who called for a mass role call - so if you back out now i wont buy the shit at all that u were providing cover.
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Guys "Distorted confirms me as toen gov everyone please folllow my vote on distorted plz and thanks" :P
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Distorted
You still cant explain to me how it is pro mafia to have 5v1 the next day =P or potentially 6v1
Wtf are you even talking about
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blinkskater
Guys "Distorted confirms me as toen gov everyone please folllow my vote on distorted plz and thanks" :P
how about you answer the questions instead of just shitposting?
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blinkskater
Wtf are you even talking about
You are voting me because I said that mafia lurker outting himself day 1 is idiotic, and u seem to think its a good strategy. that is our disagreement.
You are now saying u are not lurker, but yet u were calling for a roleclaim D1. explain that. you were obviously not giving cover for a lurker then if u wanted to have him roleclaim anyways.
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Distorted
how about you answer the questions instead of just shitposting?
What questions? Its called a long con ffs
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Oh dang I missed my opportunity to hammer Blink
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
@blinkskater
you are either lurker and need to get lowest posts today to reveal it, or scum.
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rumox
Oh dang I missed my opportunity to hammer Blink
if he doesnt hard claim u will have ur opportunity again soon.
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blinkskater
What questions? Its called a long con ffs
Your pulling a long con? explain lol
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Distorted
You are voting me because I said that mafia lurker outting himself day 1 is idiotic, and u seem to think its a good strategy. that is our disagreement.
You are now saying u are not lurker, but yet u were calling for a roleclaim D1. explain that. you were obviously not giving cover for a lurker then if u wanted to have him roleclaim anyways.
How think im voting you because we disagree? LOL im voting you because ofnyour heavy defense of SJ try again and have you thought of the chance that i wanted to see peoples reactions to me when i called for a mass roleclaim? No becauase its not on your agenda?
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
You know it wouldnt be pro town for lurker to out themselved day 2 and you know i will not be lowest poster the fact that you are willing to lynch somone you believe to be a lurker is not protown my vote will not move now
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blinkskater
You know it wouldnt be pro town for lurker to out themselved day 2 and you know i will not be lowest poster the fact that you are willing to lynch somone you believe to be a lurker is not protown my vote will not move now
Day 1**
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Distorted
Your pulling a long con? explain lol
So you want me to lay out my entire plan to get scum FFS i thought you were smartet then that
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blinkskater
You know it wouldnt be pro town for lurker to out themselved day 2 and you know i will not be lowest poster the fact that you are willing to lynch somone you believe to be a lurker is not protown my vote will not move now
You are not lurker, you claimed that. Your meta you woulda have claimed when L-1 was becoming a threat. You were pushing at other people to mass claim, and you are usually a high poster. You cannot explain what reasons you have like 30 posts this game, i figured obvious town lurker and SJ was giving u cover. Hell, i think SJ may actually be the obvious Lurker then going for the day 1 reveal.
-vote blinkskater
You would have claimed lurker if you were to confirm yourself, and you would have posted more if you were cit.
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Gg way to throw if im lynched get distored plz
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blinkskater
Gg way to throw if im lynched get distored plz
-vote unvote
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blinkskater
Gg way to throw if im lynched get distored plz
He is literally condemming himself with my lynch when o flip town
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blinkskater
He is literally condemming himself with my lynch when o flip town
you wont even explain your strategy or anything you have done rofl u just keep going to the "throwing, get him next" thats what mafia does on stand in the mod.
What is your ACTUAL defense.
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Distorted
You are not lurker, you claimed that. Your meta you woulda have claimed when L-1 was becoming a threat. You were pushing at other people to mass claim, and you are usually a high poster. You cannot explain what reasons you have like 30 posts this game, i figured obvious town lurker and SJ was giving u cover. Hell, i think SJ may actually be the obvious Lurker then going for the day 1 reveal.
-vote blinkskater
You would have claimed lurker if you were to confirm yourself, and you would have posted more if you were cit.
And you fucking know if i were mafia i'd have given you a claim at L1 dont you dare deny that
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Distorted
you wont even explain your strategy or anything you have done rofl u just keep going to the "throwing, get him next" thats what mafia does on stand in the mod.
What is your ACTUAL defense.
My defense is upon my flip you will be insta lynched its actually a sound defense
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blinkskater
And you fucking know if i were mafia i'd have given you a claim at L1 dont you dare deny that
Unless rumox is mafia with you and you are the only 2 people on...
very susp how rumox made a hammer comment, then is no longer responding.
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Distorted
Unless rumox is mafia with you and you are the only 2 people on...
very susp how rumox made a hammer comment, then is no longer responding.
Yeah great theory WHAD
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blinkskater
My defense is upon my flip you will be insta lynched its actually a sound defense
So you are a Citizen who was what? faking Lurker all day to provide cover for a lurker and calling for a mass roleclaim rendering that entire thing useless? something is not making sense. and im about to lynch
@rumox
over it
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Ah damn I missed another hammer chance
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Another reason i think you are scum is you keep getting me to post and post if you were town and thought that there was a chance i could be lurker you wouldnt want that, and i already said that its scummy as fuck to lynch somone tou think is 50/50 lurker lmao
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rumox
Ah damn I missed another hammer chance
rather than "missed a chance" what is your reads on this situation
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Memes aside, I am not hammering anyone over this discussion
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blinkskater
Another reason i think you are scum is you keep getting me to post and post if you were town and thought that there was a chance i could be lurker you wouldnt want that, and i already said that its scummy as fuck to lynch somone tou think is 50/50 lurker lmao
i dont think its 50/50 lurker. you would not allow yourself to be put on L-1 twice while soft claiming citizen with some1 who keeps popping in saying "damn missed a chance to hammer"
That seems to not even be susp to u that rumox is not offfering anything other than that. You do not seem concerned AT ALL of him potentially hammering u.
-
Re: S-FM 251: Anti-Lurkers