PDA

View Full Version : All random roles.



WingCraft
June 13th, 2011, 05:26 PM
Is this necessary?

http://i.imgur.com/PEIkG.png

Clawtrocity
June 13th, 2011, 06:34 PM
That's close to my setup. I just force a sheriff, invest and 2 docs, but other than that it's identical. Don't know about options, but in terms of roles yeah...It's fun and balanced.

Is there a certain issue you have with this setup?

freecom
June 13th, 2011, 07:15 PM
it could've been worse... i once played a game where the host decided to put a GF, sheriff, and Random Any on the rest of the slots

WingCraft
June 14th, 2011, 10:46 AM
Is there a certain issue you have with this setup?

No I'm just looking if anybody else uses this setup.

theuprising
June 14th, 2011, 12:43 PM
Is there a certain issue you have with this setup?

No I'm just looking if anybody else uses this setup.


i hate this setup simply b/c there is less strategy and more randomness b/c you literally could have like 3 investigators and know one would know, and its dumb b/c you end up either with a balanced game or a game that's really lopsided, as in 3 sheriffs, 4 doctors.

MrSmarter
June 14th, 2011, 02:17 PM
Is there a certain issue you have with this setup?

No I'm just looking if anybody else uses this setup.


i hate this setup simply b/c there is less strategy and more randomness b/c you literally could have like 3 investigators and know one would know, and its dumb b/c you end up either with a balanced game or a game that's really lopsided, as in 3 sheriffs, 4 doctors.
It is pretty random, that's why I use the adv. and basic instead of all random town. For ex.
Rand. Adv. Mafia
Rand. Bas. Mafia
Rand. Mafia
Rand. Town x5
Rand. Adv. town x2
Rand. Bas. Town
Rand. Neutral (excludes non killing)
Rand. Bas. Neutral (excludes killing)
Rand. Any (excludes killing)
This would be what I would do if I could only use randoms.